اللي اتعلمته من 500 مليون جنيه على ميتا

What 500M EGP on Meta Actually Taught Me About Scaling

The cheapest engagement I ever bought cost 0.06 EGP. The most expensive purchase I ever bought cost 174 EGP. Both were Meta campaigns, both were mine, and the gap between them is the whole subject of this article.

Most Meta advice treats the platform as one thing. It isn't. What works when you are buying attention has almost nothing in common with what works when you are buying transactions, and confusing the two is the most expensive mistake I see.

The engagement side, where volume is cheap

Across the accounts I run, engagement campaigns land between 0.06 and 0.29 EGP per interaction:

• Al-Khedeiwy: 153,629 EGP spent, 1.78 million people reached in one campaign, 0.06 EGP per engagement
• Stiefo: 2.58 million EGP spent, 3.6 million engagements at 0.07 EGP each
• Hassouna: 182,892 EGP spent, 70,466 engagements at 0.20 EGP
• My Baby: 92,076 EGP across 41 ad sets, 15,025 engagements in the best one at 0.29 EGP

Notice the spread. Same objective, same platform, and the worst cost per engagement is roughly five times the best. That spread is not budget. Al-Khedeiwy hit 0.06 EGP on 153,629 EGP of spend while My Baby sat at 0.29 EGP with less than a third of that.

Small accounts can beat large ones here, because engagement pricing is driven almost entirely by whether the creative earns attention on its own.

The conversion side, where volume gets expensive fast

Switch objectives and the economics invert. On the Sab account: 2.74 million EGP across 179 campaigns produced 14,553 purchases and 450,965 landing page visits.

That works out to roughly 188 EGP of ad spend per purchase, from traffic converting at 3.23%. On Stiefo's conversion campaigns the best cost per purchase I reached was 174 EGP.

So the same account that buys engagement at 0.07 EGP buys a purchase for around two and a half thousand times that. This is not a failure, it is what conversion campaigns cost. But if you have been running engagement campaigns and you judge your first conversion campaign against those numbers, you will kill it in week one.

Why most accounts stall in the same place

The pattern I keep meeting is an account that got good at cheap reach and assumed the skill transfers. It doesn't. Cheap reach means your creative stops the scroll. It says nothing about whether your offer closes, your page loads, or your checkout works.

Look at the Sab figures again. 450,965 people arrived on the landing page. 14,553 bought. The other 436,412 cost money and produced nothing. No amount of audience testing fixes that, because the loss happens after Meta has done its job.

How I structure a new account

Weeks one to four I am buying information, not sales. Broad targeting, five to ten creatives, conversion tracking verified end to end before a pound is spent. I am looking for which creative angle earns attention cheaply, because that is the one thing that reliably transfers later.

Weeks five to eight I take the two or three angles that worked and put them behind a conversion objective. Cost per purchase will look terrible next to the engagement numbers. That is expected. The question is not whether it is cheap but whether it is profitable after product cost, shipping and platform fees. Those are different questions and most people only ask the first.

After that, scaling is mostly restraint. Raise budget on what works, resist rebuilding what isn't broken, and accept that every meaningful budget jump temporarily worsens your numbers while the algorithm re-learns.

What I see go wrong most

Tracking that was never verified. I have inherited accounts where the pixel fired on page load instead of purchase, so every reported conversion was fiction and the optimisation had been training on noise for months.

Judging conversion campaigns by engagement costs. Covered above, and the most common one by far.

Rebuilding campaigns that are still learning. Meta needs roughly 50 conversions per week per ad set before its optimisation is worth anything. Most people restart well before that and never let it get there.

Chasing ROAS while ignoring margin. A 4x ROAS on a product with 70% cost of goods loses money. I have watched accounts celebrate their way into losses this way.

Where this leaves you

These numbers are from live accounts, not benchmarks I read somewhere. Yours will differ, because your products, margins and market differ. What should transfer is the structure: buy attention cheaply first, prove the offer converts second, and never let one set of numbers set your expectations for the other.